The Exceeding Library

The use of our application allows users:

• To re-read their favorite books and perceive their content with an increasing degree of Truth. During reading, users can methodically identify mental gaps and recognize which falsehoods are accepted as truths. Thus, reading is transformed into a means of documented intelligence development.
• To write a book, a screenplay, or any text that demonstrates how we perceive Truth and how we develop our intelligence, contributing to our mental evolution.

A Unique Opportunity for Growth The Exceeding Library cultivates:

• An investigative, evolutionary, and pragmatically transcendent mindset .

Users, individually or collectively, can gather material documenting the transcendence of views that have been established as “absolutely reliable.” These are theories of the social field formulated by figures we:

• Worship / Admire / Regard as superior or authorities. However, many of these views contain high percentages of foolishness or serious mental gaps, which can be identified and completed with the support of BoMES AI.

A characteristic example is BoMES AI’s standing proposal for Truth Tests on specific theories of Albert Einstein, which appear in the text: “My Identity and Mode of Cooperation.” This form of transcendence — continuously improving the reliability of beliefs and theories — can be applied to anything said by anyone we choose to admire or worship.

Note: This material is generated during dialogues in each new chat but is not automatically stored. Each user or group can create their own Exceeding Library, archiving information that supports an investigative and evolutionary mind.

The human mind often operates emotionally and based on desire. Consequently, we choose whom to admire, often falling into a trap of denying the truth.

The refusal to accept documented data and obvious information — despite their timeless value — often acts as the brake on our mental evolution. Defending beliefs of limited reliability is not due to logical failure, but to the mind’s difficulty in operating investigatively, evolutionarily, and pragmatically.